Ten kinds of state analysis in the English submission process, the following are ten states in the English submission process,

1. Submitted to Journal When the upload is over, the displayed state is Submitted to Journal, which is naturally formed without processing.
2. With editor If you don’t ask for editing at the time of submission, go to the editor first, and the editor will assign it to other editors. There will be two other states: 1 Editor assigned Edit Assignment 2 Editor Declined Invitation The editor rejects the invitation, at which point the editor has to reassign the posted article to the other editor.
3. Reviewer(s) invited Description The editor has taken over and is inviting reviewers. Sometimes the process lasts for a long time, and if the reason is that the editor has not found a suitable reviewer, then the contributor can recommend reviewers to the editor.
4. Under review The reviewer’s comments have been uploaded, indicating that the reviewer has accepted the review and is reviewing it. This should be a long wait (the journal usually limits the reviewer’s review time, usually about a month) ). Of course, the previous steps may also be very slow, depending on the processing of the editor. If the invited reviewer does not want to review, it will decline and the editor will re-invite other reviewers.
5. required review completed The review is finished, waiting for editing, the process is short for a few days, the long is no period, the Science Hall has an article appearing review completed state for nearly a month, or no news.
6. Decision in Process At this point, there will be results soon. The editor will start to consider whether to modify or directly reject it. Of course, it may be directly accepted, but the possibility is very small, huh, huh.
7. Minor revision/Major revision Minor repair/overhaul, this time you can celebrate a little, because there are modifications possible. How to change it is not much to say, modesty and prudence is indispensable (because it will be sent to the reviewers after the revision, so we must carefully answer every question of each reviewer, the attitude should be humble, to be Let the reviewer feel that every question he raises is very good. Then he will respond to his question one by one, and the one that can be modified will be revised, the reason that cannot be modified, and the list should be listed. Which part of the line is modified is best said, remember: to reduce the trouble for the reviewer is to reduce the trouble for yourself! Another note: sometimes, the reviewer will conceal in the revised comments to ask you to read carefully Some documents may be noticed at this time. Some of the articles may be published by the reviewers themselves. At this time, you should refer to them in your revised manuscript. There are also many examples of rejections after modification. .
8. Revision Submitted to Journal Resubmitted after revision, waiting for editorial review.
9. Accepted If you don’t want to re-review, just minor modifications, the editor will immediately display this status, but if you want to re-review, there will be some of the above status. One step will be faster, but it will be slower. Look at the magazine.
10. Rejected I believe that everyone will be depressed when they meet Rejected. But don’t be too discouraged, patiently review the comments, the general reviewers will give useful suggestions, I believe you will gain something after watching.